Recent Entries
Put Oil Firm Chiefs On Trial
---------------------------
75 Percent Of Our Top Kids Leave CT Within 3 Years
---------------------------
Is Dihydrogen Monoixide Seeping InTo Your House?
---------------------------
Angry Soccer Moms
---------------------------
Will Hillary Take The VP Slot?
---------------------------
Obama And The Politics Of Can Not
---------------------------
Happy Tax Freedom Day!
---------------------------
The Man Who Would Be King
---------------------------
CT Top Ten In Foreclosures
---------------------------
Let’s Kill A Growing Industry Providing New Jobs
---------------------------
Milestone, 70,000th Visitor
---------------------------
Taxpayer Bill Of Rights
---------------------------
Obama’s Willful Disregard Of The Facts Or Poor Command Of Economics
---------------------------
A Study On Getting Old People To Leave Connecticut
---------------------------
Forcing Businesses Out Of State
---------------------------
Get Back To Work, More Taxes To Pay
---------------------------
It Is The Economy, Stupid
---------------------------
Obama Calls For Checks On Executive Pay
---------------------------
Democrats Propose New Tax
---------------------------
Record Business Closings: Press Conference Held
---------------------------
Big Problem With Global Warming
---------------------------
Global Warming, Follow The Money
---------------------------
Katrina, Wal-Mart CEO: Above All Do The Right Thing.
---------------------------
Typical Obama voter: young, clueless
---------------------------
The Income Tax Started In 1913
---------------------------
Obama: A 28% Tax Would Not Be Confiscatory
---------------------------
Conversion of Democrats To Conservatives
---------------------------
Driving Oil Higher With Low Interest Rates
---------------------------
The Home ATM Is Closing. The MEW Is Down!
---------------------------
Listening to Colin McEnroe Slowly Twist In The Wind
---------------------------
The Upcoming Period Of Hyper-Inflation
---------------------------
Obama’s Spending Plan Up To $300 Billion
---------------------------
Airbus, Alabama, Boeing, and McCain and Pratt
---------------------------
10 Countries Have 82% Of The World’s Oil
---------------------------
Advice For Big Mac
---------------------------
How Governments Makes Things Worse
---------------------------
McCain’s Letter to Obama, I won’t make the same mistake again
---------------------------
Global Warming Religion, Heretics In New York
---------------------------
Connecticut Congress Peoples Promise Oversight On The US Airforce Tanker Contract
---------------------------
Sorry, Barack And Hillary, The Bush Tax Cuts Were Fair
---------------------------
What Voting Democrat Means To Small Business
---------------------------
Obama Is Depressing
---------------------------
Chris Dodd Is MAD! Does Anyone Care?
---------------------------
Obama, Liechtenstein, Protectionism and The London School Of Economics
---------------------------
Obama’s Ticket Balancer
---------------------------
Ethanol Plant Construction Stopped, Or Buy Cargill Stock
---------------------------
Regulations: Cost Of Doing Business, Or Shipping Batteries 101
---------------------------
British Times Newspaper: Is America Ready For This Dangerous Leftwinger?
---------------------------
Redemption Of America’s Image Abroad
---------------------------
Saturday Cartoon Pick
---------------------------
Archives
Meta
« Previous —
Next »
20 March 2008
There is theory that low interest rates drive up commodity prices. And the converse, high interest rates drive down commodity prices. Commodities are things like oil, corn, soybeans and wheat.
This theory has been around a while, at least a decade or so and there is statistical evidence to back it up. It’s all the buzz on the economics blogs. Honestly I don’t understand the mechanisms, and I wonder if many of the people buzzing about this theory do either, since they are all citing the same examples with no underlying explanations.
The evidence cited is a graph:

This may look like a scatter plot but the correlation is statistically significant.
The mechanisms given are:
High interest rates reduce the demand for storable commodities, or increase the supply, through a variety of channels:
* by increasing the incentive for extraction today rather than tomorrow (think of the rates at which oil is pumped, gold mined, forests logged, or livestock herds culled)
* by decreasing firms’ desire to carry inventories (think of oil inventories held in tanks)
* by encouraging speculators to shift out of spot commodity contracts, and into treasury bills.
All three mechanisms work to reduce the market price of commodities, as happened when real interest rates where high in the early 1980s. A decrease in real interest rates has the opposite effect, lowering the cost of carrying inventories, and raising commodity prices, as happened in the 1970s, and again during 2001-2004. It’s the original “carry trade.” The theoretical model can be summarized as follows:
This is from the Jeff Frankels Economics blog. Over at Harvard.
The only way I can explain this and this is my explanation, only mine:
If the interest rates are low, than the cost of carrying inventory is deceased, allowing companies not to mind carrying larger inventories, larger inventories decease supply available to the consumers, driving prices up. Got that? Whereas high interest rates increase the cost of inventories to the point where companies have every incentive to get the commodities to market as fast as possible. Of course this seems to be a short term effect, in my mind. A dismal science indeed.
I post this because our Federal Reserve is pumping cash in to the credit markets via crashing interest rates. According to this theory our commodity prices will skyrocket.
Well, they already have and if this theory holds true, they will be somewhere around Pluto before years end.
I have to ask is the medicine worse than the illness?
In fairness I should mention the Federal Reserve does not believe in this theory, obviously.
Another point to make in all of this is: Don’t think the Fed’s meddling in our economy is done by a set of hard and fast and proven rules. They may be some of the best minds of our time, but, their models may reflect or model the last recession. And may not be accurate for this recession.
Additionally this is an election year, and we do know that politics will influence policy.
Posting your comment.
Leave a Reply